Wednesday, May 13, 2009

How US want the world to be?

U.S. president Obama accused China of imprisonment and harassment of journalists, during his speech to “the world press freedom day” on May 1, 2009.

Certainly it will make China unhappy. I urge America to respect and face the facts to regard China of the press freedom situation in China and respect her judicial and sovereignty rights. Please put an end to “irresponsible remarks” on China.

The United States 's commission on international religion freedom also proposes to continues to classify China as a “county of particular concern” and condemn their religion freedom situation. Again this will upset China . The report has no factual basis and is full of prejudice. Chinese from various ethnic groups and at various locations enjoy religious worship freely by law, the facts are obvious to all.

America has repeatedly urge China to cooperate to improve the world financial and economic crisis. But on the other hand she criticizes China’s press and religious freedom ? Big mouth certainly will not gain!

Even thought China’s press and religion policy was not as free as America. But however if every countries in the world adopted America freedom policy with no difference on freedom level. Then who else will still admire America freedom? American’s freedom will have no value for sale!

The president of United States and smart politicians should know what kind of world could be beneficial to the US? and to be able to attract people to admire America's model of freedom and demoncracy. Therefore America should be pleased to see there are some not as free in the world?

美国要怎样的世界?

美国奥巴马总统5月1日发表关于“世界新闻自由日”演讲时,指责中国监禁及骚扰记者,引起中国不满,敦促美国应该尊重事实,正确看待中国的新闻自由状况,尊重中国的司法主权,停止对中国“说三道四”。
美国国际宗教自由委员会发表2009年度报告:继续建议把中国列为“特别关注国家”,并指责中国的宗教自由状况,又引起中国的不满,指美国有关的报告毫无事实依据,充满偏见,中国各民族、各地人民都依法享有宗教信仰自由,这一事实是有目共睹的。
美国口口声声要和中国合作改善世界经济和金融困境,却不忘指责中国的新闻和宗教的自由状况?!肯定会言多必失!
就算中国对新闻和宗教信仰真的没有美国那样自由。但如果世界各国都和美国一样自由开放,没有程度上的差别,那还有人会响往美国的自由吗?美国的自由还有价值吗?
聪明的美国总统和政治家们应该晓得要一个什么样的世界才对美国有利?才能使世人对美国的自由有所仰慕和响往——当然要一些和美国有所不同的国家。

No comments: