The Norwegian Nobel committee on 9 October, 2009 awarded the 2009 Nobel peace prize to the U.S. president Barack Obama. Surprising the international community expressed different comments positive and negative opinions. The Taliban in Afghanistan said: Obama should have got a “Nobel prize of violence”. Iran said:” the U.S. president after wining the Nobel peace prize should put more efforts to make himself a real peace maker.” Iraqi Aoerkazha Lane said: “he is not qualified to receive this award all America made problems in Iraq. Afghanistan has not been solved. The man with slogan of changing has not make any changes.” Obama winning is more symbolic and for imaging. More results are needed from him. Obama in the diplomat front has made many positive efforts. The biggest bright spot is the denuclearization and the efforts to improve relation with the Islam’s world, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, Iran and other countries to ease the tension . They also decided to give up the missile defense plans in eastern Europe. These could be his wining scores. In addition to the international award-winning big surprise for Obama, but also reflects some concern for Obama’ diplomacy in addition to suspect that Obama can implement his promise of beauty. But the Obama administration’s trade prolectionist tendencies is also very concern some observers believe that Obama has deliberately ignore its trade protectionist tendencies in Newcastle and this tendency on the global economic recovery and world peace will have immeasurable harm. For example, a recent entry announced that china’s tire-dumping will face a heavy import duty that would trigger a chain of effect. The U.S. user will be pay higher import duty. Rubber market will go down, the rubber plantation will suffer. China may also raise some U.S. imported produces duty to against the U.S. protectionist policy. Obama himself also “surprised by the deep feeling of embarrassed he will take this honor as a spur actions.” However, to achieve as a peace maker president. Much first of all to win the confidence in the world and to quell the negative criticism president Obama might have to create a “peace department and appoint a full time “peace minister. Spend money and effort and changing the mandate of the exiting oversea military into a “peace keeping armed forces” to help eliminate all kind of disputes between states to states to make a real contribution for lasting peace in the world.
设立“和平”部队
挪威诺贝尔委员会１０月９日把２００９年度诺贝尔和平奖授予美国总统贝拉克奥巴马，令不少国际人士大感意外，纷纷提出正反双面的评论。阿富汗塔利班嘲弄说：“奥巴马应该拿‘诺贝尔暴力奖’” 。伊朗方面说：“美国总统获得诺贝尔和平奖后应该更加努力使自己‘名副其实’” 。伊拉克人奥尔卡扎里说：“他现在不配获得这个奖，所有美国制造的问题——伊拉克、阿富汗问题都没得到解决，这个以变革为口号的人还没做出什么变革”。奥巴马的获奖较多是象征意义和想象成分，而尚未看到较多成效。奥巴马上任以来在外交方面的确做出许多积极努力，最大亮点是在无核化方面的努力，改善与伊斯兰世界的关系，和俄罗斯、古巴、委内瑞拉和伊朗等国缓和关系，尝试化敌为友，放弃在东欧设置反导计划也得分不少。从这些角度看奥巴马得奖是在情理之中。国际上对奥巴马获奖除了大感意外，也反映出人们对奥巴马外交的一些忧虑，除了怀疑奥巴马能否落实他的美丽诺言之外，奥巴马政府的贸易保护主义倾向也十分引人关注，一些观察家认为和平奖颁给奥巴马有故意无视其贸易保护主义倾向之嫌。而这种倾向对全球经济的恢复乃至世界和平都将产生难以估量的危害。例如：最近对中国轮胎入口宣布征收倾销税的措施，将会引发连锁的效应，美国用户将会因为轮胎起价而影响其业务，国际胶价大跌使种植人吃亏，中国可能也会对部分美国入口货提高入口税，对抗美国的保护主义。奥巴马本人也“感到很意外，深感受之有愧”，说将把这个荣誉当作行动的鞭策。要做到名副其实的和平总统，提高世人对他的信心，平息反面的批评，奥巴马总统也许应该成立一个专职的“和平部门”，委任一个“和平部长”，出钱出力将驻守在世界各地的美国军队改变任务，负责搞好世界和平工作，改称为“和平部队”，协助消除国与国之间大小纠纷。为世界的持久和平做出真正的贡献。
No comments:
Post a Comment